Home About Us Technology F.A.Q. News Contact Us
QUICK ORDER
Pay balance

News

07 of February, 2020
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) vs. Sonography for Prenatal Gender Prediction
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) vs. Sonography for Prenatal Gender Prediction

Conducting a DNA test while pregnant, whether it be for fetal gender prediction or paternity testing, has become an invaluable testing procedure for countless expectant mothers as a non-invasive solution, helping keep themselves and their soon-to-be child out of harm’s way.

 

Invasive alternatives such as chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis are burdened by a higher propensity towards miscarriage – an imperfect solution.

 

An article by De los Santos (2018) published in the Journal of Medical Diagnostic Methods sought to shed light on the efficacy of two non-invasive prenatal gender predictive techniques: PCR and ultrasonography. Before deconstructing the results gathered, let’s go over the fundamental differences between the two respective techiques:

 

How PCR Is Used For Prenatal Gender Prediction

Real time PCR analytical techniques are built on the foundation of targeting both single and multi-copy genes, known as SRY and TSPY respectively, from the Y-chromosome in maternal DNA (typically gathered via blood sampling). By way of amplifying these fragments in the lab, they become a replicable, accurate (~100%), and safe means of identifying the sex of a fetus early on in the gestation period.

 

How Ultrasonography Is Used For Prenatal Gender Prediction

The act of sonography occurs later in the gestational period (~12 weeks) as opposed to a PCR DNA test while pregnant (7 – 12 weeks). The reason behind this stems from the observational nature of sonography - it can only be performed once the fetus has fully developed external genitalia.

 

PCR vs. Ultrasonography: The Results

Not only could fetal sex be determined approximately twice as early during gestation for PCR as opposed to ultrasonography, PCR scored >30% higher than ultrasonography in correctly predicting the sex of the fetus when it was female (97% and 61% respectively).

 

De los Santos (2018) also observed how male fetuses were subject to greater risk of misclassification from ultrasonography; similar conclusions, however, were not drawn when extrapolating the data of a PCR DNA test while pregnant – falling in line with much of the existing literature and meta-analyses that have been published.

 

REFERENCES

De los Santos, J. (2018) ‘Comparing a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Based Analysis for Gender Determination in Early Stage of Pregnancy versus Sonography’, Journal of Medical Diagnostic Methods, 07. doi: 10.4172/2168-9784.1000277.

Back to news
No comments yet...
*** Your email address will not be published.
Name:

E-mail:

Comment:


Choose the test